Halle Berry’s Daughter Makes Her Public Debut

posted by Sista on July 20th, 2008 at 7:34 pm


Introducing, Nahla Ariela Aubry! Halle Berry, who chose not to sell photos of her daughter to the highest paying tabloid, finally stepped out into the public eye with baby Nahla, and the paparazzi were right there to capture the moment. Above are just a few of the photos now flooding the internet and I think it’s safe to say, Halle will not be pleased. Clearly the paps invaded a private family moment and one I am sure Hallle did not want shared with the world.

32 Comments

  1. Wow! Were they hiding in the bushes at her house or something? It all looks like a rather private moment to me. I guess nothing is sacred once you sign the contract to become a celebrity. I don’t know if this is even newsworthy in a world where there are wars, hunger, economic disasters, etc… Still, its a beautiful moment between a mother and her child, if thats the response the photographer was hoping for. SMDH!

  2. Halle didn’t step out into the public, she stepped out into her backyard and those animals were hiding in her bushes or up in a tree somewhere. I am happy Halle didn’t sell her daughter out but this is why celebs atrted selling baby pics anyway, to stop the photographers from hounding them like this.

  3. Smooth Criminal

    Those scumbags (the paparazzi) are like leeches; sucking every ounce of blood as they feed off of one`s flesh. I mean in this woman`s damn backyard of all places.

    @charden,

    I agree this is not newsworthy considering considering the illegal wars in Iraq and Afgahnistan. Not to mention the “genocide” in Darfur where more than 300,ooo have died. All because America, “this criminal enterprise”, has a sensationable appetite for oil. These photos of Halle`s baby, no doubt, will find their way into the mass media for certain; what a drag…….

    MJ and the 80`s forever

    Peace and Power To The People

  4. Smooth Criminal

    Typo correction:

    The American Government, “this criminal enterprise”, has a sensationable appetite for oil.

  5. THATS NOT THE PUBLIC THAT WHERE SHE AND THE BABY LIVE AND IT WAS SO DAMN RUDE FOR THEM TO BE IN HER DAMN GRASS IT’S HER RIGHT TO NOT WANT THE BABY TO BE SEEN DAMN PEOPLE ARE TO MUCH!!!

  6. That’s is sooo wrong for them. And I hope Halle didn’t have anything extremely important on that laptop screen either.

    Folks have no shame these day’s.

  7. I agree with everyone above, this was not a public moment or debut of her beautiful baby. This was clearly an invasion of privacy. Tsk, tsk at the photog who obviously hid in the bushes or trees with a high powered camera to take these pics.

    Still, Halle and Nahla are simply beautiful.

  8. Halle needs to fire her security team. Obviously they are not doing there job.

  9. Stalkarazzi have no right to post pictures of her Halle’s baby when she clearly wants privacy, I hope theres some way she can sue..They have no respect for privacy or safety..It’s completelydifferent when you have trashy ho’s like Paris, Kim K, and Lindsey Lohan who crave the attention, making sex tapes and running around Hollywood with no panties on, but it’s a whole nother story when you’re hiding in bushes, spying and invading someones privacy who clearly wants to be left alone..The law really sucks sometimes.

  10. The Paparazzi are ridiculous. It’s one thing to be walking on the streets of Manhattan, or Paris, or Rodeo Drive. But at home? People always talk about Celebs selling their baby’s pictures, this is why. If they can get that first shot out themselves, then they’ve not only killed a big check for the paparazzi but dulled some of that excitement.

    How do some celebs do it? It has to at least cause some serious paranoia.

  11. who ever took these pics must of received mad $$$

  12. AWWW!

    Glad to get a glimpse of the baby… hate the way it’s been done.
    Luv Halle!!

  13. I think it is so wrong how they can be so intrusive, I suppose being a celebrity has its perks and its down sides and paparazzi hiding in a tree outside your garden is one of the down sides….

    But her baby looks really sweet, glad to see they are both doing well….

  14. Wow celebs get no privacy. Baby looks cute even though you can’t see her face. Look at her little feet. so sweet :-(

  15. Halle know the deal you know someone was going to get a shot of that baby like it or not. Alot of people want to know what she look like. @ Brown-Sugga i was thinking the same thing someone got some paper for them shots. So she minds will just get her picture with the baby on some cover or they will not be worth nothing and the person that taking them picture be having her money in there pockets.

  16. The papparazzi don’t get paid all of that money for pictures because they don’t sell. So before we go and start putting them down let’s ask ourselves have we bought anything that have these pictures in them. Because they will show up in People, star, enquirer and all those other magaizines as well. People go out and buy those pictures and that is why they sale them. I think the Papparazzi should be stopped as well, but, I understand why they do what they do it’s money. So until they are stopped they will keep doing what they do. If you and I picked up a camera and just started following someone around we would get locked up for stalking. But because they bring so much revenue in they call it papparrazzi.

  17. You all blame the paparazzi. What about the blogs, like this one that publishes it to make it even a bigger deal??????

  18. She is cute. It’s about time we get to see her!!

  19. I agree with coco and bria, we are guilty! However, I do agree, that it is disrespectful for them to be invading privacy at her home. I think laws should be set because it is getting utterly ridiculous. LOL @ the fact the pap still got NO face shots!!! Ha, Ha!

  20. i don’t see anything wrong with “celebrities” selling their pictures to magazines if they are using the money to give to charities such as brad and angelina. it also keeps the paparazzi away, if you put your pictures in a wide spread magazine the pictures become useless because no one is willing to pay big bucks for a picture that someone has already seen. only when you hide the child will the paparazzi invade your privacy as you see with Halle. when she decides to show her child to the world my hope is that she gives all of the black publications the first look like ebony,essence,jet, upscale etc. but we all know that won’t be the case, black people always run to white magazines for everything, now that is what piss me off when our own don’t support black media i’m not pissed just because poor rich Halle baby picture was taken when you know that when the time comes vogue,instyle,people,etc will get the first pictures anyway!!!!!!! and then afterwards the little black magazines will get the leftovers.

  21. From the little i can see of this baby, i think she is beautiful and im glad Halle was blessed with having her own child.

    A s for the paparazzi, i totally agree, we are obssessed with celebrity culture and this is how they make their cash and there are pecks to each job and i know if she had given in, this wont happen and it would also be a way for Halle to stick two fingers up to her ex husband as i heard he was taunting her about not having her own child.

    Anyway whats done is done.

    Halle also had the right to say No!

  22. I agree with Lady…if ur gonna be outside with the baby anyway AND U KNOW them paparazzi’s will be there as well u might as well get ur money’s worth and take a pic of the baby on a cover or sumthin…..u’ll get ur money’s worth!

  23. I am happy Halle has FINALLY found happiness. Make a regular Fabulous chick like myself feel like I can find it one day too!

  24. Invading someone’s home, celebrity or not, is just plain wrong. I would much rather wait to see a cover or something rather than a pic like this. For what can be seen, she looks like a cutie pie!

  25. Amber-Silly rabbit, Trix are for kids!

    On another site there are some pics of Halle showing off her personal pics of her baby to some folks in a store.

  26. I cannot see what this child looks like from this pic. I’m all for celebrities selling their baby pix!!! Peeps would still pay paparazzi for some candids but backturned pix like this wouldn’t coz a stir. I cannot believe this post. There’s no debut. I cant SEE her.

  27. people lighten up.. If Halle didn’t want this pic taken it would not have been taken….

  28. I hope the baby looks her mother. The world sure needs more people like Halle in the world.

  29. Awwh, poor…I mean rich Halle. Cry me a river. She’s a freakin’ celebrity for goodness sakes. The reason why she is so paid and can enjoy that multi million dollar backyard is b/c there are paps out there squirming to take her pics and people eager to buy them. You can’t take the good and leave the bad with any gig. I am so sick of celebrities whining about their privacy (except for extreme cases where safety is at issue) and the public (who buys these pics might I add) agreeing.

  30. ‘Gloss n Glam” its more then apperent that Halle didn’t know the cameras were there considering that she looks to be at her home…so how would she have “wanted the pictures to be taken”? Im sure if she had known that someone was on her private property taking pictures she would have not appreciated it at all.

    You are up in another post about her hatin’. Get a life.

  31. Why are you all whining about the paparazzi when obviously you came here to see these pics? I suppose you buy the glossy magazines with all the stars in their, ‘not so best moments’ too. You bunch of hypocrites.

    I can’t say I like the way the paparazzi sometimes get their pictures either, but if it were not for people like you wanting them, they wouldn’t do it.

Get Adobe Flash playerPlugin by wpburn.com wordpress themes

Copyright © 2010 Brown Sista | Design by E.Webscapes | Log in